Catena Fidei

Search

Search arguments, verses, authorities and passages

Christ Pantocrator, Byzantine icon painter

John 14:10

Byzantine icon painter, Christ Pantocrator, 6th century · Saint Catherine's Monastery, Sinai · Public domainByzantine icon painter, Christ Pantocrator, 6th century, Saint Catherine's Monastery, Sinai

VerseNew Testament · Read in context

John 14:10 (WEB)

Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? The words that I tell you, I speak not from myself; but the Father who lives in me does his works.

Catechism · 1

  • §470Paragraph 1 · The Son of God Became ManRead at vatican.va

    “In his soul as in his body, Christ thus expresses humanly the divine ways of the Trinity:” — Catechism footnote: Cf. Jn 14:9-10.

Fathers and councils · 72

Gregory of Nyssa

  • “…uttered by the Lord is far removed from falsehood, he will of course be persuaded that He speaks the truth Who says, “I am in the Father, and the Father in Me,”—plainly, the One in His entirety, in the Other in His entirety, the Father not superabounding in the Son, the Son not being deficient in the Father,—and Who…” — editor's note: S. John xiv. 10

    Read the whole comment
  • “…Who has the Eternal Father in Himself, and is contemplated in the eternity of the Father, as He Himself says, “I am in the Father, and the Father in Me.”” — editor's note: S. John xiv. 10

    Read the whole comment
  • “For if things at “variance” are not in harmony, and He Who is sealed by the Father, and displays the Father in Himself, both being in the Father, and having the Father in Himself, shows in all points His close relation and harmony, then the absurdity of the opposing views is hereby overwhelmingly shown.” — editor's note: Cf. S. John xiv. 10

    Read the whole comment
  • “…antecedent to the existence of the Only-begotten, be led by their reasoning to the idea of non-existence), saith, “I am in the Father, and the Father in Me,” in the sense that neither is that which is not conceived in that which is, nor that which is in that which is not.” — editor's note: S. John xiv. 10

    Read the whole comment
  • “…change, but My very self, Who am in the Father—will have seen that Father Himself in Whom I am, because the very same character of Godhead is beheld in both.”” — editor's note: Cf. S. John xiv. 9, 10.

    Read the whole comment
  • “If any one should say, “The ‘beginning’ which is mentioned in the Gospel”—it is the Father Who is there signified, and the confession of the Son together with Him is there pointed to, nor can it be that He Who is in the Father, as the Lord says, can begin His being in Him from any particular point.” — editor's note: S. John xiv. 10

    Read the whole comment
  • “For it is not this that He indicates Who said, “He that sent Me is with Me,” and “The Father that dwelleth in Me, He doeth the works.”” — editor's note: S. John xiv. 10

    Read the whole comment

Irenaeus of Lyons

Tertullian

  • “For as in the Old Testament Scriptures they lay hold of nothing else than, “I am God, and beside me there is no God;” so in the Gospel they simply keep in view the Lord’s answer to Philip, “I and my Father are one;” and, “He that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and I am in the Father, and the Father in me.”” — editor's note: John xiv. 9, 10.

    Read the whole comment
  • “If, indeed, He meant the Father to be understood as the same with the Son, by saying, “He who seeth me seeth the Father,” how is it that He adds immediately afterwards, “Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me?”” — editor's note: John xiv. 10.

    Read the whole comment

Athanasius of Alexandria

John Damascene

Theodoret of Cyrus

  • “It is most absurd to affirm that the Father ever existed without the Son, for that this could never be so has been testified by the Son Himself, who said, ‘I am in the Father, and the Father in Me;’ and ‘I and My Father are one.’” — editor's note: John xiv. 10

    Read the whole comment

Ambrose of Milan

Augustine of Hippo

John Chrysostom

Hilary of Poitiers

John Cassian

Catena Aurea on John

  • Hilary of PoitiersCatena Aurea on John

    A declaration so new startled Philip. Our Lord is seen to be man. He confesses Himself to be the Son of God, declares that, if He were known, the Father would be known, that, if He is seen, the Father is seen. The…

    Read the whole comment
  • Augustine of HippoCatena Aurea on John

    For to that joy of beholding His face, nothing can be added. Philip understood this, and said, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. But he did not yet understand that he could in the same way have said,…

    Read the whole comment
  • Augustine of HippoCatena Aurea on John

    But how is this, when our Lord said that they knew whither He was going, and the way, because they knew Him? The question is easily settled by supposing that some of them knew, and others not; among the latter, Philip.

    Read the whole comment
  • Hilary of PoitiersCatena Aurea on John

    He reproves the ignorance of Philip in this respect. For whereas his actions had been strictly divine, such as walking on the water, commanding the winds, remitting sins, raising the dead, He complained that in His…

    Read the whole comment
  • Augustine of HippoCatena Aurea on John

    When two persons are very like each, we say, If you have seen the one, you have seen the other. So here, He that hath seen Me, hath seen the Father; not that He is both the Father, and the Son, but that the Son is an…

    Read the whole comment
  • Hilary of PoitiersCatena Aurea on John

    He does not mean the sight of the bodily eye: for His fleshly part, born of the Virgin, doth not avail towards contemplating the form and image of God in Him; but the Son of God being known with the understanding, it…

    Read the whole comment
  • Augustine of HippoCatena Aurea on John

    But is he to be reproved, who, when he has seen the likeness, wishes to see the man of whom he is the likeness? No: our Lord rebuked the question, only with reference to the mind of the asker. Philip asked, as if the…

    Read the whole comment
  • Hilary of PoitiersCatena Aurea on John

    For what excuse was there for ignorance of the Father, or what necessity to shew Him, when the Father was seen in the Son by His essential nature2, while by the identity of unity, the Begotten and the Begetter are…

    Read the whole comment
  • Augustine of HippoCatena Aurea on John

    He wished him to live by faith, before he had sight, and therefore says, Believest thou not? Spiritual vision is the reward of faith, vouchsafed to minds purified by faith.

    Read the whole comment
  • Hilary of PoitiersCatena Aurea on John

    But the Father is in the Son, and the Son in the Father, not by a conjunction of two harmonizing essences3, nor by a nature grafted into a more capacious substance as in material bodies, in which it is impossible…

    Read the whole comment
  • Hilary of PoitiersCatena Aurea on John

    The unchangeable God follows, so to speak, His own nature, by begetting unchangeable God. Nor does the perfect birth of unchangeable God from unchangeable God forsake His own nature. We understand then here the…

    Read the whole comment
  • John ChrysostomCatena Aurea on John

    Or thus: Philip, because [he thought] he had seen the Son with his bodily eye, wished to see the Father in the same way; perhaps too remembering what the Prophet said, I saw the Lord, and therefore he says, Shew us…

    Read the whole comment
  • Augustine of HippoCatena Aurea on John

    He then addresses all of them, not Philip only: The word that I speak unto you, I speak not of Myself. What is, I speak not of Myself, but, I that speak am not of Myself? He attributes what He does to Him, from whom…

    Read the whole comment
  • Hilary of PoitiersCatena Aurea on John

    Wherein He neither desires Himself to be the Son, nor hides the existence1 of His Father’s power in Him. In that He speaks, it is Himself that speaks in His own person; in that He speaks not of Himself, He witnesseth…

    Read the whole comment
  • John ChrysostomCatena Aurea on John

    Mark the abundant proof of the unity of substance. For He continues; But the Father that dwelleth in Me, He doeth the works. As if He said, My Father and I act together, not differently from each other; agreeing with…

    Read the whole comment
  • Augustine of HippoCatena Aurea on John

    For he that edifieth his neighbour by speaking, doth a good work. These two sentences are brought against us by different sects of heretics; the Arians saying that the Son is unequal to the Father, because He does…

    Read the whole comment
  • Hilary of PoitiersCatena Aurea on John

    That the Father dwells in the Son, shews that He is not single, or solitary; that the Father works by the Son, shews that He is not different or alien. As He is not solitary who doth not speak from Himself, so…

    Read the whole comment
  • Augustine of HippoCatena Aurea on John

    Philip alone was reproved before.

    Read the whole comment
  • John ChrysostomCatena Aurea on John

    But if this does not suffice to shew ray consubstantiality, at least learn it from My works: Or else believe Me for the very works’ sake. Ye have seen My miracles, and all the proper signs of My divinity; works which…

    Read the whole comment
  • Augustine of HippoCatena Aurea on John

    Believe then for My works’ sake, that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me; for, were we separated, we could not be working together.

    Read the whole comment

Cross-references · 47

  • Cited together in On the Holy Spirit I.11 and 1 other place.

  • Cited together in Against Eunomius II.9 and 1 other place.

  • Cited together in Against Heresies III.13.

  • Cited together in Against Eunomius VIII.5 and 1 other place.

  • Cited together in Ecclesiastical History II.6.

  • Cited together in Against the Arians IV.1.

  • Cited together in Against Heresies III.13.

  • Cited together in Against Heresies III.13.

  • Cited together in Against Heresies III.13.

  • Cited together in Against Heresies III.13.

  • Cited together in Against Heresies III.13.

  • Cited together in Ecclesiastical History II.6.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith V.12 and 1 other place.

  • Cited together in Ecclesiastical History II.6.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith V.12.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith V.12 and 2 other places.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith IV.6.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith IV.6.

  • Cited together in Against Eunomius VIII.5.

  • Cited together in On the Holy Spirit I.11.

  • Cited together in Against the Arians IV.1.

  • Cited together in Against the Arians IV.1.

  • Cited together in Against Eunomius VI.3.

  • Cited together in Against Eunomius II.9.

  • Cited together in Against Eunomius IV.8.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith IV.6.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith IV.6.

  • Cited together in Against Eunomius IV.8.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith V.12.

  • Cited together in Against Eunomius II.9 and 1 other place.

  • Cited together in Against Eunomius II.9.

  • Cited together in Against Heresies III.13.

  • Cited together in Against Heresies III.13.

  • Cited together in Against Eunomius VIII.5 and 1 other place.

  • Cited together in On the Holy Spirit I.11 and 2 other places.

  • Cited together in Against Eunomius II.9 and 2 other places.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith IV.6 and 1 other place.

  • Cited together in Against Eunomius XII.3 and 2 other places.

  • Cited together in On the Holy Spirit I.11.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith IV.6.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith V.12 and 2 other places.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith V.12.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith V.12.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith V.12.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith V.12 and 2 other places.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith IV.6.

  • Cited together in Exposition of the Christian Faith V.12.

Connections

Cited together with · 19

Cited together with · 28

Cited by · 52

Around this entry

Open the whole map
  • Old Testament verses
  • New Testament verses
  • Passages
  • Favorites
  • prefigures → fulfilled
  • taught → disciple · succeeded →

Hover to trace, click to select, double-click to open.